incompetent is putting it mildly. they bought all the lies and overlooked the truth. they speculated and believed all the lies the defense threw out there. they let the killer go free!

OK, Leave the jurors alone, thier names should not be made public only if they want to tell people, it should be up to them. They did the best they could.
Trust me, Casey Anthony's life will not be peaceful, Karma will find her one way or the other.

Hey Joseph, were you the guy seen outside the courthouse holding a sign asking Casey Anthony to marry him?

Joseph get off your high horse you moron we all know the constitution say innocent until proven quality you probably just think in your backward mind that repeating it over and over makes you more american then the rest off. You say that the jurors didnt want to believe the prosecutions "conjectures or ideas" casey is probably thanking god right now that she didn't have to prove herself innocent she just had to lie enough to make it seem possible someone else did it

wow Mr Rainier.. you certainly have a lot of time to devote to this... perhaps this is what you do in YOUR life!!!

Joseph get off your high horse you moron we all know the constitution says innocent until proven guality sorry your ignorance made me forget how to spell

My opinion is that she killed her daughter, but, I also believe that if she knew what happened (as the defense stated), accident or whatever, she should be just as guilty. She was found competent, and no competent person would just carry on with their life as if nothing happened if they knew of the death of their child - you lie and act that way if: 1) you are truly "crazy" or 2) If you are guilty.

I never usually post comments but the people who emotionally rage about an innocent person need to look at themselves......we are quick to judge others, however, the average person lies 8 times a day starting with "how are you" in the morning and responding, "I'm fine".....when there tired, sick or whatever. The constitution of the United States of America was upheld and the Prosecution who spent thousands of tax payer dollars to probe the unthinkable to try and prove something impossible to prove, should realize the jury decided absolutely correctly to not guilty. I agree with Jose Baez about the death penalty and why, any American or human being would want another person put to death for a crime completely un-proveable, tells me you people have no regard for human life and are more guilty to even think and wish this on someone than the person being accused of the crime...... The FACTS AND EVIDENCE clearly show Casey as NOT GUILTY. You mean spirited people who live in a fantasy of revenge towards another human being because the media created a "frenzied soap opera" with the coverage.......Casey Anthony did nothing but defend herself like any other American person would do. Like any Prosecutor or State's attorney, they had no one else to blame. You all need to move on with your life and accept the reason we have juries and a constitution is to determine facts and a verdict. .

The prosecution had a weak case. Period. Everything was circumstantial. You cannot convict anyone unless their guilt is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. These judicial rights are what we celebrate every July 4th.

the jury must have watched a different trial than the rest of us. disregard the media frenzy, soap opera, nancy grace and all the others you want to blame. there ARE people who can look past that type of thing to see the trial and truth.
Casey was responsible for her daughter. she killed her. the evidence was there.
yes, the jury should be ashamed for letting her go free; there were lesser charges they could have agreed on.
it seems they (the jury) was more interested in getting home. NO ONE should profit from this little girl's murder. NO ONE. not the spiteful bitch of a mother and certainly not the incompetent jurors.

Hey Anthony jurors: what color was Napoleons white horse

Juror Reply: duh, whats a horse

If you believe that there was not enough evidence, you are blind. The mistake was made when they tried to hone in on the way she died and could not prove it. No matter what the jury could have convicted her on lesser charges. I am a soldier and believer in the constitution but also believe in justice for victims and common sense. I believe they got lost on the true definition of REASONABLE doubt. The defense portrayed it as if you think anything wired she's free. That's not reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt paints another person did it. She admitted her daughter was dead she should be responsible for her life.

Oh Helen pointing fingers again Huh? Three pointing back at you.. :0)

All the public opinion out there...oh excuse me outrage. The outrage is because the case was tried in the media dn on talk shows....I noticed nacy Grace's big mouth has calm down a bit..she tried this case on her show over and over all for ratings and alot of people fell for it. Gophers!!

I mean it paints the picture that another story could have happened, there was absolutely no evidence to support an alternate story. Therefore no reasonable doubt that Casey Anthony knew her daughter was dead, said nothing, dumped her body, lied some more, and now she's free. Reasonable doubt if what.! There is no other story. She even denied she drowned in the prison phone tape,, to her parents!! To George and Cindy . How can there be no evidence, how can there be reasonable doubt to who was responsible.

Well isnt this something , If you believe in God , this is comforting , cause this only shows God knows and its in his hand . Vengence is mine says the Lord and he will take care of all thats guilty even those who lie for KC . God hates evil and those who have pleasure in it and hides the wrongness of the matter
Lightning is striking , judgement is comming one way or another . If you have spirtual insite you can understand this
http://discussions.sun-sentinel.com/20/soflanews/os-casey-anthony-tree-lightning-20110707/10

I was most disappointed that the jurors didn't take ample time to thoughtfully review the evidence for any more than the measly 9 hours they deliberated. Did any meaningful debate take place in the jury room?? Were any of the following evidentiary items even considered?:
• Caley missing for 31 days
• Casey does not report her child "missing"
• Casey parties like there is no tomorrow while child is "missing"
• Casey gets "Bella Vita" or beautiful life tattoo 2 days after child goes "missing"
• Casey's car goes missing and turns up smelling like a dead body
• Casey lies to her parents, friends and police about Caley' s disappearance
• Casey's attorney accuses the family of everything except Casey's murder/disposal
If you dispute all of the above evidence and dismiss it out of hand, how do you then in good conscience accept at face value everything the defense alleges about the drowning of Caley, the molestation of Casey by her father and brother, and the general dysfunction of the Anthony family?
That is precisely why the general population is questioning your judgment.

Im with you Cathy. The verdict is in, she may not have been found guilty on earth but somehow it will all come to pass.

Joseph legal field my ass... this much time on here says welfare....

Joseph, I simply stated that I was most disappointed that they did not debate the evidence before them, but they accepted at face value everything the defense presented.

The vigor with which you attack each person whom you disagree with is disturbing. Don't you care whether we get "upset" if you think we are also incompetent?

Hey Joseph,

If my dog was missing for 31 minutes, I would freak out. I dont know if you have children but if my daughter was missing for 31 seconds i would freak out also. So this isn't about the constitution, and its not about you either. Its about real like pal. Hope you have a long healthy life and that you never experience a missing relative.

everyone should put all this energy into helping other children, all this back and forth won't change the outcome that has been handed down. Like I said, help a needy child or any child in Caylee's memory.

I think that every juror on that panel were total IDIOTS! If they want to say there wasn't enough proof for Pre-Meditated murder or child abuse, manslaugter etc... then they deserve the same treatment that the whole world will give Casey because they didnt think enough about this poor little innocent child to give her justice they are mistakenly wrong! I hope this haunts them all for the rest of their lives. IF duct on a child's mouth isn't enough proof and not reporting her child missing for 31 days=Abuse and Partying it up while her daughter is rotting away then there is truely something wrong with these people! Seems to me they were in a hurry to get out in the public to do interviews and make money off of this. Which is the other Biggest mistake they have made by letting AMERICA and other Countries know they were the ones who set a killer free. That is something to be really proud of. Its amazing that the whole world knew she was guilty but they couldnt see it. Then they get out here and see how furious they have made everyone and they want to make excuses on the decisions they made. And they were sick to their stomach to make a not guilty verdict. Yeah right! You think seeing little Caylee's skull with duct tape over her mouth would have made them sick but NO I guess to these Idiots its ok to kill your child and let them get away with it. My 7 yr old son had more sense than anyone of these people He knew she was GUILTY!

People think the jury is incompetent because they basically admitted that they were. Jennifer Ford going on national television in exchange for a trip to Disney World saying that there was no "absolute" proof of murder. Absolute is not the law - the law is reasonable doubt.
Russell Huekler went on national televison and said that Casey Anthony was a "good mother". That is insulting on so many levels. One thing that was "absolutely" proven was that she knew her child was dead and she let her body rot in the wood & be torn apart by animals. A "good mother" doesn't do that. So, screw you Huekler and your bs.
Every single one of you put George Anthony on trial because he might have had an affair, but gave Casey a pass for lying until her daughter's body decomposed & evidence was destroyed....THEN say the State didn't have enough evidence.

That's quite a message to send. Its okay to kill children as long as you can hide evidence??? Really???

Each one of you have to live with your decision and that will be your own private hell. Jennifer Ford says she can sleep at night, but I doubt it since she is trying to validate her horrible lack of judgement and reasoning.

May God help you if you ever have to put your faith in justice in the hands of 12 people that could sell out to the highest bidder. You might just get the "justice" you gave.

This jury was composed of the most unintelligent 12 people I Have ever seen grouped together. What a bunch of incompetent morons

Incompetent is putting it nicely WHAT IDIOTS

Jury thought they were on vacation at tax payers expense. Took more time reading dessert ladies menu than actually discussing the evidence. I hope they are shunned by all of the state of FL. What an embarrassement

WOW even the heaven above are showing the wrath of no justice , I would be shaking in my boots if I was the defence team or KC or the Anthonys or the jury or anyone that takes the side of evil doing . It is dangerous to temp God at all specially in evil .
.http://discussions.sun-sentinel.com/20/soflanews/os-casey-anthony-tree-lightning-20110707/10

Oh so the jurors are surprised that 92% of the World think they are incompentent? Let's see; she was the last person to have access to Caylee and to her car, she lied for 2 years about a job and college, she stole from anyone not looking, she lied about a Nanny and friends, she dodged her parents and she didn't call ANYONE for 31 days after her child was missing/drowned/lost (depends on the day of the week), she had access to the duct tape, the Pooh blanket, the laundry bag. There is so much more and if the dimwitted, incompentent jurors would have BOTHERED to exam the evidence and ask questions, they would have connected the dots. For Gods Sake you were given a map and bread crumbs, I guess you also needed a compass and tour guide. You will forever be lumped in with the OJ jurors..morans all 12 of you.

As evidenced by some of the comments uttered by a few of the jurors, it is as clear as a bell that this jury collectively was ignorant of what they were charged to do by Judge Perry. Ten hours would not have been nearly enough time to peruse the mountains of evidence in this case, nor intelligently discuss the various charges available to them. No questions were asked, no evidence was requested for review. There is no other conclusion other than to conclude that this jury was ignorant, lazy, and a complete embarrassment to the residents of Florida. It's actually funny that these jurors didn't even attempt to hide their indifference to their obligation. All they wanted to do was get out of there, pronto. Again, Florida is a laughing stock to the nation, and to the world. Great going Jurors. You really did a bang-up job of proving your complete stupidity to the world.

This verdic as it is concerns me alot , for the MESSAGE IT SENDS ALL OVER THE WORLD , that other potential killers that will kill the little children . The familys of victims can lie and cover up a murderer, that may be a family member or freind in their life . IT is a DANGEROUS MESSAGE THAT WAS JUST SENT OUT .

It is obvious to me some or many of the jurors can be viewed as totally incompetent. Take number 3 who claims she has no clue where this could happen, says pull over in parking lot or back seat or trunk. There was direct evidence presented that Casey hung around in the area till George left for work by her cell phone records. So either number 3 was still hung over from the night before, hit the bong prior to that that day's testimony or is incompetent IMO for how do you miss that evidence hung out in area till George left for work. then the other alternate says no motive, hello law is state does not need to prove motive. And this alternate for this article more or less simply says no evidence or not enough. IMO when you are incompetent nothing would be enough. Then there is another that says 6 to 6, really, if that were true they'd still be in Orlando and maybe right about now the judge might entertain a hung jury. Plain and simple they just had no interest in deliberating IMO and/or wanted to go home, and add a measure of total incompetence for some or many of them. Add as well for some of them a total and complete lack of ethics as they talked about the case when they were told not to and agreed not to. Demanding to see the heart sticker via note to the judge is proof the unethical IMO creeps involved in that were talking about evidence presented when they were not supposed to discuss anything with anyone!

Juror number three is very immature minded. The defense did good job picking up on that.
The defense must want only death row clients from now on because a person would be crazy to use them-so their plan backfired on them. I wouldn't want to be a
so-called famous lawyer for getting Casey out of jail.

I think the jury members are stupid idiots and I hope they are happy maybe something will happen to one of their kids and they will have 12 people on the jury just like them that only gives their kids. Less than 1 day of deliberately since they let a murder go free and poor little innocent caylee got no justice unreal they are stupid and should of never been aloud to do this sad sad sad they really make me sick I never watched Nancy or anything else just the trial the same as these so called jurors and she did it come on where is justice

10 hours!! That wasn't even enough time too read the Jury instruction. Incompetent? YES YOU ARE!...... And let a baby killer free so you all can go home and use your phone,computers and play farmville. Disgusting!!

everyone making comments about what happened in the courtroom, either has nothing better to do or just plain stupid. Perhaps you need to read up on the constitution and the law. The prosecutors went for the highest crime of capital murder. that was their biggest mistake. there must be a motive and a cause of death. they had neither. just speculation. If you convict a person on her character and not evidence presented, it's not only a violation of the constitution but NOT HOW THE US LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS. Perhaps with all of your time,, you should do your research before making stupid comments. i'm glad each of you isn't a juror or innocent people would be sentenced to death. I think she is guilty as sin but those jurors cannot convict on evidence that wasn't there. kuddos to them. Justice was served because her life would have much better in prison. She's going to have a tough time surviving outside of those walls mark my words.

One point I don't hear anyone bring up when pointing out this sluts guilt is the cadaver dogs. These dogs have no allegiance to anyone and only lead their handlers to the truth. Two dogs on two separate occasions hit in two spots at the Anthony home : next to her playhouse and her car trunk. What did these jurors think of that ? Were the dogs in on it ?? What a crime she will walk away laughing !! Hopefully she will meet up with someone just as evil as herself.

IMO it is time for change, in our jury system. I think this country is in need of PROFESSIONAL juries in all felony cases. Science has become far to advance for the average person to understand.The experts have studied and done research in their fields for years. It is impossible for them to clearly explain evidence and what it means, in the short amount of time they are on the stand. In all honesty, I also believe that people do stop listening to topics they do not understand or are not really interested in. The Anthony verdict is what it is, and while I DO NOT AGREE with it, we must move forward, and learn from it. I am disappointed in what is being said in the few juror interviews out there so far. It seems to me they were not clear on the instructions, or did not spend enough time reviewing the evidence. We know Caylee is dead. We know Casey was the last one with her. She is GUILTY of something.No dysfunction in the world explains how she behaved for 31 days, period.

those of you who are wishing something bad to happen to the jurors or their children are just as evil as Casey anthony. I feel sorry for you and your miserable life!

Joseph Rainer,
For the record, there is no evidence to support your overgeneralization that housewives and waitresses are not intelligent, but clearly your constant reference to an awareness that a constitution exists is your attempt to come across as intelligent. By the way, I have two degrees and have studied psychology and the law extensively. Casey likely suffers from Narcissitic Personality disorder and Anti-social Personality disorder which means her skills to lie, manipulate and hoodwink others is extensive. The jury was seduced by this and with the help of the lies her lawyers supported how could they not be; however, the trouble w ith this jury is they did not look at any of the evidence while deliberating; furthermore, many of the questions that jury num. 3 wanted answered were answered. Take a look at the cell phone records that Jeff Ashton brought to the jury's attention. The fact that a body decomposes, thus rendering little forensic evidense, should not prevent a leap away from common sense. There was duct tape on the childs skeletol remains. It didn't get there on it's own. If interested, look up Col. (formerly) Russell Williams; he murder his victim Marie France with duct tabe across mouth and nose. We know this as fact because he filmed it. Too bad Casey didn't leave that kind of evidence, so as to put to rest foolish attempts at excusing her actions. You're entitled to your opinion, but common sense you should also look into.

Laurie, nice try but jurors had option to choose lesser crime that did not include death as a punishment. And state is not required under the law to provide motive. So maybe you can acquaint yourself with the laws of this land, Florida law in particular, since you brought that subject up and since you want to bring up the Constitution as it is obvious from your post you are not familiar with either.

Yep you can kill your child and 31 days or more later report it (It's not against the law to not report your child missing). So when you are sure the body is decomposed enough so they can't tell what happened you can call 911. Don't worry you won't go to prison.
You dumb ass jurors you make me sick to my stomach!!!!!!!!!!
I hope somebody knocks that bitch off before she makes one penny off her daughter's death!!!!!!!!!

I believe this jury think they did their duty. But I seriously question that they realised they actually are allowed to think for themselves, actually re-examine testimony, ask questions , do a little connecting of the dots with what I consider to be overwhelming evidence. How much more evidence was needed to place Caylee's dead body in that trunk. They had the stench, the hair with decomp banding, her trashbag decoy, cadaver dog alert. Even if they chose not to consider Dr Vass's opinion, did they actually consider who had exclusive use of the car and the Big Trouble T shirt. Did they give one thought to her borrowing a shovel, when her mother thinks she's in Tampa. Did her lies on the jailhouse tapes and her attempts to implicate others totally pass them by. And how in heck does duct tape keep the mandible in place. Nowhere in jury instructions does an exact cause of death have to be determined. Though in this case I think accidental drowning is totally unsupported. Does the method of how Caylee was disposed of suggest accident. Neither does motive have to be shown by prosecutors. By this jury's standards Scott Peterson would also have walked. His jury took 8 days and they did look at ALL the evidence in its totality. They didnt leave common sense with the dessert lady. Sorry but next Wednesday a child murderer and imo pysycopath will be back in our midst.

I am just as mad as 3/4 of my fellow Americans. However, CA would have had a sweet prison life and now she will be set free to a world that hates her. Justice WILL prevail, you can bank on it. RIP sweet little child..

The jury obviously didn't understand that reasonable doubt doesn't mean any doubt. The nursing student (I'm a nurse and we don't need her in the profession) didn't even remember that the neighbor saw Casey back up her car to the garage the day Caylee went missing. They never asked to see any of the evidence or ask any questions. This is rare for a trial of this magnitude. They also had the mistaken impression that they would be sentencing Casey. Oh how I wish they had been smarter and asked questions when they didn't understand the judge's instructions. I don't want any of them to be hurt if their names are released, but isn't it ironic that they are so concerned about themselves, but showed so little concern for justice for a little child.

And the bad thing they could of done a lesser charge if they couldn't do 1st degree murder but now she gets away with everything and walks free Wednesday great job

I am very sad for the fact that there seems not one or even two among them that can come clean and admit there were those who were discussing evidence coming in when they should not have been. They cannot even afford poor little dead Caylee that TRUTH. It is obvious it was happening from that demand to see the heart sticker. It would be easy or should be easy to do that for Caylee. There is a reason jurors should not be discussing evidence coming in, is distracts the focus of the panel and could be the result of one or two who deliberately wanted to disrupt the panel. I just cannot believe, given they likely still have Judge Perry contact info, or chief judge in Pinellas, that they will not at least fess that up for little Caylee.

We speak of this Juror #3? Well look what this lil nursing students background holds. http://www.pcsoweb.com/InmateBooking/SubjectResults.aspx?id=1410423
Yes this was part of our justice system!!! Pathetic.

It's hard to believe there could be 12 people that STUPID in all of Florida, much less all sitting on the same jury!

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you...Pinellas county for upholding your duties you were assigned. I am sure each one of you are intelligent, and obeyed the law. I congratulate you for doing what was right, and making the correct verdict, based on our justice systems laws. Thank you for not jumping on some hater train and seeing things in the proper light. I commend you all!

http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/07/2-jurors-voted-casey-guilty-but-got-swayed-somehow/comment-page-94/#comment-215372

Casey Anthony has a gift that will get her what ever she wants. Casey is a very affective very convincing liar. Look out world here she comes. And you will pay her to talk to you, to lie to you, God helps us!

I only have one question to ask all the jury haters - "How would you like to be convicted of a crime you didn't commit just because of what the tabloids have to say about you?" Wouldn't you want your trial to be decided by hard evidence and not public opinion, talk show hosts, rumors, and spectulation?

Most people don't understand the law, but the jury could not convict Casey, because the prosecution did not "prove beyond a reasonable doubt" that Casey killed Caylee. We can't have innocent people sitting on death row just because people "think they might be" guilty. They have to be proven guilty under the law.

There is such a thing as karma. If Casey Anthony is really the evil psychopath that media has made her out to be - if she really did killed Caylee - then she will come to a bad end and then she will meet her maker. There will be justice even if it is divine justice.

The story of Caylee is heartbreaking and she will never be forgotten. Caylee is in Heaven, and she didn't die in vain. If Caylee's Law is passed in several states, then children who are abused, neglected, abducted, or murdered will be protected in the future. If you don't know what Caylee's Law is then google it. Children disappear and are abused and killed every day, but they most don't get the kind of attention this case did. Everything happens for a reason and the jury did their job. God Bless Caylee and may there be justice.

The verdict was a "travesty of justice" for an innocent little toddler who deserved so much more than this. The verdict set a precedent for mothers who want rid of their responsibilities as a parent. Caylee is dead and she didn't kill herself. The prosecutors gave the jurors a motive. Casey wanted to live the beautiful life and it showed pictures of her partying. The cause of death was suffocation by duct tape and cholorform. The last time she was seen was June 16th with her mother. What is so hard about that. For those who think it was "just" an accident...Duct tape is NO accident. It is an intentional act. Casey didn't want Caylee from the time she found out she was pregnant. The jurors didn't hear that one, but they had enough evidence to convict. We all have to accept the verdict, but we don't have to like it. The killer of a helpless little girl was set free to walk among us.

I have lived in Florida for 40 yrs, and never did I think a child would be killed by her mother and a jury allow her to walk free! I didn't watch Nancy Grace, only the trial when I could and videos of it. This is truly a disgrace! Casey Anthony, her attorney, and jurors cashing in on the death of a little 2 year old girl......sickening!

I wonder if the juror that got an all expense paid trip to Disney World thought of Caylee while she was there enjoying herself? Poor little girl probabaly never had the chance to go to Disney.

I'm not 100% convinced that Casey's parents didn't help try to cover things up or dispose of the body. For those of you who are parents - if your child committed a crime would you turn them in or would you try to cover for them? What if your child was facing death row - would you try to protect them or let them fry? Then it gets more complex - if you were a grandparent and you thought your child might have killed your grandchild (whether intentionally or accidentally) - would you still cover for them? The whole family is disfunctional and they lie because they don't want to face things. Casey doesn't want to face responsiblity. Her parents for a long time probably didn't want to face the fact that Casey is an evil, lying, bitch who needs to grow up and be a human. I'm not so sure that George didn't try to cover for Casey as the defense alleged.

Other point - no one really knows if Caylee's death was intentional or accidential so the jury wouldn't know if it was 1st degree murder, 2nd degree murder, manslaughter, or some lesser charge. No one even knows how she died. On the one hand, if Casey was partying and didn't report her missing she looked guilty. On the other hand, if Casey had planned the murder in advance I think she would have called the police right away so that she wouldn't appear guilty. The 31 days of partying and lying really show that she can't face responsibility whether she is purposely evil or just a pathetic excuse for a human.

Joseph if I didnt know better Id say u were Caylees biological father longing to rekindle w the crazy bitch and live happily ever after. You seem the most passionate and also the dumbest. Quite honestly I had to stop reading a few passages ago but I agree w the majority of you. She killed her daughter PERIOD. And by stating the Lord owns revenge simply proves you agree w us. Btw isnt church and state seperate? Our legal system screwed up, someone following the story for an hour could see there was more than enough evidence to convict Casey and her bipolar alter ego. Oh, and I look forward to OJs public confession as much as hearing you got run over by a car =)

JUDGE BELVIN PERRY KNOWS THEY ARE COMPLETE AND UTTER MORONS AND THAT THEY MADE THE wrong DECISION.

Not guilty is VERY different from innocent.

What do you mean you don’t know what happened to Caylee? If you feel sick, it’s because YOU didn't do your job, not because the State didn't prove their case. OMG.
How is a baby in the woods an accident ? The only one who knew where the body was Casey and she wasn't talking because she had more important things to do. This is a good mother ? One who doesn't work, lies about it and steals to live - and then says her father and her brother sexually molested her ?
Oh, yeah, Judge told you to disreguard that. UT OH another BIG ASS LIE ...If there is any logic in there, I can't find it. Either you are on psych meds or you need to be.
You think you can say the state didn't prove the case and thats going to excuse your sloppy judgement ? No one believes that, and you and your 11 cousins made a huge mistake the whole world watched on the internet.
So, how did you feel when you found out she is a 6 time convicted FELON ? She initially plead not guilty then too, but threre were tapes of that GUILTY

Too bad she didn't make a home movie of how SHE KILLED CAYLEE so you would KNOW what happened. Because of you and your merry little band, I will never have any faith in our legal system again. YOU 12 failed CAYLEE and the whole world knows it. Too bad you never will. The American dream is DEAD
Last thing - I would never buy any book or buy any product you guys might endorse. Most of us never want to hear anything you have to say because you have as much credibility as Casey.

this dude is the dean eckstadt was just a back up, he wasn't there for the deliberations so he doesn't matter. Obviously this idiot just wants his 15 minutes of fame for doing nothing.

ONLY REASON YOU ALL ARE TALKING is because you want to make money off a little innocent girl named caylee just like her crazy mom and grandparents and those attorneys already signing with agents wow where is caylee constitutional rights what about her you all are sick people

Juror #3 needs to stop talking. She makes her group sound more lazy and inept with every syllable. This woman failed to take a single note, and apparently like the others failed to re-examine one piece of evidence during deliberation.. She certainly failed to get that opening statements are not evidence and that the State are not required to prove motive. She also totally missed out that KC's ping phones had her at the house on June 16th till after 4.00pm. Then she says she doesnt have a clue what happened to Caylee. Remember her, well juror #3 she's the one in the photogrpahs, the one who was wrapped in a winnie the pooh blanket, (big clue) stuffed in a trash bag, then stuffed in a WHITNEY design laundry bag (anothe big clue) then she was tossed like a piece of roadkill into woods 15 houses down from where she used to live (huge clue).Oh and she was 34 months old and had three pieces of duct tape over her face. And her Mom borrowed a shovel when she nipped home from her conference at Tampa..

ALL JMHO..I think there was an accident that day. I believe George and Casey were both at home. I do believe George found the body. I do believe George was complicit in a cover-up and actually demanded it of Casey..because I do believe he had molested Casey and believe he had started molesting Caylee. he knew if there were a soft tissue autopsy, he woulda been busted for diddling with the baby, again, JMHO. You don't not take your teen daughter to a doctor with stated serious menses period problems because your a nurse and handle things yourself, you would however, not take your young daughter with serious menstrual problems to a doctor, because sexual abuse might be discovered. Evidence that was kept out of the trial: what about George Anthony's escort service involvement, and deviant sexual fetishes, of coarse because George Anthony wasn't on trial, but why didn't LE follow up on that? could have certainly painted a diff picture for everyone. Thats just a few slivers of much stuff!!...again..MOO

"We are upset that people think we're incompetent," he said..."

Oh, let's be honest, Dean. We think you are actually retarded and probably illiterate, not just incompetent. And here's why:

"Ford told ABC News that the prosecution's case had too many holes for the jury to convict Anthony of first-degree murder."

This, of course, leaves even the casual observer flummoxed: So...why did you then find her not guilty of manslaughter and aggravated child abuse? Surely the facts of this sweet child's murder warrant some criticism of her apparently criminally insane mother...no?

The jurors can claim any excuse they want, the issue they have is their friends, family, coworkers and community saw the trial and the evidence entered. that is how people know Ford is IMO full of it when she pretends she had no idea where Casey could have done the deed, acting and pretending like she would have to pull to side of road or parking lot, when there was direct evidence entered by phone records Casey hung around the area of the house till George went to work. Let these jurors spin all they want to try to excuse what they did. It almost seems as if they would tell you Caylee searched for chloroform and how to make it months in advance and then secretly deleted the searches so they end up in deleted files. And caylee applied the duct tape to herself and used so much chloroform on herself it is still detected more than a month after the car is abandoned. These jurors sat there, they heard Dr. Vass detected chloroform first before OCSO then searched the computer and found it as a result of Dr. Vass observations on samples from trunk. Let them and their minority of total population enablers spin al they want, they just look worse the more they say in media.

Juror #3 argued in a TV interview: "If not for the death penalty, we might have convicted her."

As the article below states, at that point in the deliberation it was NOT the jury's job to consider the penalty. That takes place in the penalty phase. "If she’s saying that her findings of fact would have been different had a nonevidentiary variable been changed, then she’s actually practicing a subtle form of nullification here. "

http://alturl.com/dio9j

The manslaughter charge was at 6-6. Normally, juries with this type of split end up finding the defendant guilty. But....Juror 3 was tired of seeing the pool from her hotel window and upset that she couldn't go swimming...another juror had a cruise to catch...and all of them were tired of being there. With weeks of testimony and all that evidence, not ONE question was asked of the court. It is obvious that their deliberations ended Monday at 6PM because they were dressed up on Tuesday morning. The decision was made and the rush to injustice was announced.

Jurors, please don't worry about whether we think you are incompetent or not. That answer will come as you see Caylee's bones in your mind before your fall asleep every night, knowing that while Casey was accused of throwing her baby daughter in the swamp, you may have been the vehicle that took her to the land fill.

Sue, if it really were ever 6 to 6...they would still be in Orlando, and the judge would have to find a hung jury and declare a mistrial and a new trial with new jurors would take place. It was never really 6 to 6 as how could you get 6 people that fast to change their mind and vote not guilty. I think these jurors need to stop giving media interviews, IMO each time they do they look even worse.

Lin you do realize you are talking as well dumbass. We have opinions like everyone else and no one here is trying to cash out on anyones behalf. I hope the real Zenaida does however sue the bitch for defamation bc once that story didnt check out to be true IT BECAME OBVIOUS SHE KILLED HER DAUGHTER. Duck tape is no accident unless they wanted to create the image someone else had done it. Which is more sickening than her Bella Vida tattoo in the 31 days, the only time she was truly free. Her body is free but her mind will never be.

"I would rather live in a society where a guilty person goes free than one where we put the innocent in jail because we just KNOW they did it. I would rather take my chances with an unstable individual than with unstable laws."

Wow Misty that is laughable..if jurors "KNOW they did it" then they vote guilty, what part of that common logic did you fail at before deciding to post your nonsense? Let me guess you are one of the main 12 or an alternate in the trial or a friend or family member of one of them with that debased logic you just offered for us all to see.

I agree misty..you are not of mentality....when a panel KNOWS as you boldly typed KNOWS...they vote guilty...take your drivel elsewhere as it just doesn't wash. It sounds like the evolving stories from a juror or two or an alternate or two.

I think that the alternate Juror (Dean) probably had his eye on Casey. How could he NOT believe that she could kill Caylee? There are notorious cases that prove a mother CAN kill. Think Susan Smith and Diane Downs!

The "Jury", and I use that term lightly, didn't even bother to go over the evidence. Not one thing was asked for. Unbelievab­le in itself. They either had to be intellectu­ally lazy, or totally incompeten­t . It was a circumstan­ial case. Plenty of people get convicted without a body, or evidence of how the death occured. Look at all the mob trials. The victim is in 50 feet of water, with concrete shoes on. No one ever finds the body, and no one knows how they died. I really do not know what this jury expected out of the prosecutio­n. They had enough evidence to convict her twice over. And don't forget, if it was not for her lies to the police, the body could have been recovered much earlier. Of course, she would not have wanted that, as they could have linked her to the body. This alone would convict her in my mind. It is hard to believe that 12 people could have found her not guilty. Not one person could challenge the rest. It is disgusting­!

Hey Misty......I respect our system of justice, just not this intellectu­ally challenged jury.

I think a movie should be made about C.A. with Lyndsey Lohan playing the part.One moron slut playing another murdering moron slut.Then our friend joseph could be the salivating jury foreman ready to turn her loose no matter what logic or evidense said.

Incompetent? Putting it mildly. Karma is alive and well and just remember how many potential jurors they went through to get this jury? That will give you an indication of why they sat on this jury. Nothing else to do, plus no common sense.

Lifemustgoon I was talking about the jury members remember #3 already got a disney trip for talking

misty...then get ready to stay sad for a long time as I am among the majority view held in this matter. Also having grown up in Pinellas and having great teachers, I know how to pay attention to important things like evidence presented in a case. You know, like cell phone data indicating Casey hung out till her Dad left for work, then after he left for hours shown at home area after he left unlike juror number 3 and seems maybe her colleagues. Also i am an honorable person, I would not discuss the case evidence as they IMO did when they were not supposed to, proof is their demand for heart sticker evidence, they talked and if I had, after I left my conscience would eat at me and I would do the honorable thing and confess there were discussions going on when they should not have been. and worse IMO, far worse and a slap to little Caylee, is so far not one has the decency to report to Judge Perry or Chief judge of Pinellas that jurors were discussing the evidence when they should not have been, the heart sticker demand proves they were.

Like everything else in this country now-a-days, people are afraid to act on their convictions. Yes, proof, but there is also personal knowing. You can't take that away from a person, even one on jury duty. If everyone is so sure of unbiased justice, the two people on the jury who said they could not judge a person, should not have been chosen to be on that jury. It was a very serious case (life or death). I heard the convoluted story about one being okay'd so the other should be too, so as not to show racism. So just let the two of them go. No consequences for actions. She deserves to serve time and she did it. We all know it, but if on the jury, you can't make your decision freely. More things were reasonably doubtful than being of reasonable doubt. I think they were in a hurry to get home and knew they could make a judgement of "not guilty?" more easily concerning their conscience, than guilty and they did not want to take any longer and argue with jurors who did not agree. Yes, I blame the jury, they are the ones who could have made her pay for not wanting Caylee and just discarding her like a bag of garbage. Hypocrites all of them. If not sure, but more sure, then give her some jail time (life maybe) and hope, in time, her not guilty plea comes to fruition. There is just plain evil out there and the people who refuse to believe it will always live with their heads in the sand.

misty, the judge did not address it one way or the other..and my comments were about what the jury did, not what the judge did. You take an oath not to discuss something, you don't discuss it. And no the judge could not have ruled against the jurors decision liar.

This trial was not about finding out the truth...as the defense claimed. It was all about them winning at all cost regardless of who they ruined in their path. Now, we have Cindy's cousin calling into a radio station to announce a book will be coming out and the truth will be told. Yes, right. No one in that family tells the truth. The purpose of the phone call was to sell the book. That is what that was about. I, personally, will not buy any books or look at any movies involving the Anthony family. I followed this case from day one and read every document. The jury left a killer of an innocent baby walk free among us.

I find it hard to believe that the jurors and alternates did not speak about this case prior to deliberations. On the night of the verdict, one of the alternates spoke on TV and said "WE", then corrected himself and said "I". THEN, this alternate DEAN comes on an says "WE". Something is not right here. This is just my opinion...

The jurors will have to live with their comscience and get asked this question the rest of their lives :

It's hard to understand how Anthony escaped conviction on the third count of the indictment: aggravated manslaughter of a child.

In order to be found guilty of that charge, the prosecution did not have to prove premeditation or prior intent. The "legalese" contained in the indictment is not difficult to interpret. According to WESH:

The defendant by "culpable negligence -- while a caregiver to Caylee Marie Anthony -- .fail(ed) or omitted to provide Caylee Marie Anthony with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain Caylee Marie Anthony's physical and mental health -- ."

The indictment applies as well to failures to protect baby Caylee from "abuse, neglect, or exploitation by another person" which could cause the death of the child.

Certainly the "culpable negligence" was evident even from circumstantial evidence. Did the jury need included videotape instructions?

The jurors DID not look at the evidence. It took only 11 hours to come back with a Not Guilty. They did not take time to start from scratch and look at the huge evidence in front of them. Missing for 31 days, lying about Caylee's whereabouts knowing that she was dead, the duct tape, the ME report, the tatoo, the smell of decomposition, the cadaver dogs, etc, etc, etc. They were not incompetent,they were plain Lazy and careless. It is so much easier to just say " not guilty, let's get our of here. They were tired and sick of all of the people during testimony. But if they went back to day one, and look at the evidence, it was there to convict her of aggravated manslaughter at least. It was not a death penalty case, but it was manslaughter. They jury just failed to do the job they were called to do. Eleven hours is not enough time to even read the judge's instructions. Just lazy.

These jurors obviously talked about this case before deliberations even started. They did not even go through the evidence to answer some of their unanswered questions. With all that evidence .. I am to think 11 hours was enough to review it to help answer some of the questions they had. Right, they were getting ready to go home, chatting, and doing their nails during that 11 hours. It's disheartening that these people took their responsibilities so lightly and set a baby killer free to kill again.

Cheri, you are so correct. These jurors were supposed to give young Caylee a voice and a fair decision. They were supposed to take the time and look through all of the evidence. What this juror #3 is coming up with is absurd. She is saying there was no cause of death and no time of death. Holy Christ !! There was no cause because young Caylee decomposed to bones, of course you can't prove how she died but you have to use your common sense at that point and say, duct taped over the nose and mouth, pretty obvious how. The time, uh, Caylee was never seen again after she left with Casey, so the time would have been soon after the time she left with her alone. Why would the juror need a specific date to convict ? These jurors should be prosecuted themselves !!!!!

People have every right to be outraged. Most murders don't have a witness. The crime is a puzzle that intelligent people guided by both sides have to put together. Not once did I hear during the trial exactly how Caylee died and if they tired to save her...where are all those details??? I think what I find the most upsetting about this jury.....they charge her on 4 counts of lying yet they believe this story about a drowning? And then what type of person would dump her daughter in a swamp, isn't that a big clue for the jury.. They should have been able to piece enough of the evidence together to come up with one charge besides the lies. Can 95% of the world be wrong on this. It is very sad now people will think they can get away with murder. This jury must have wanted to go home and one of them said they weren't emotionally involved....wow that is a scary thing to hear, what kind of person could hear all that testimony and not feel somehow emotionally involved especially when it all lies in their hands. I realize the jury has to take a step back to look at the big picture...in this case I honestly don't feel they did. That Tuesday morning it wasn't a 12-0 vote but within a few short hours it is???? To me they should have deliberated at least a few more days to make sure they examined everything very carefully. I hope for their own sakes they are still thinking they did the right thing although for the life of me I just don't see how they could let her off.

Those jurors from Pinellas County just wanted to go home. They were totally incompetent. They came to the courthouse the next morning in dress suits, knowing that they would be giving their verdict. They just waited until lunch time to make it look like they actually put some thought into it. I live in Orange County, Fl and if the jurors were chosen from here, like they should have been, there would have been a completely different outcome. There has been so much comparison to the Scott Peterson case due to all of the circumstantial evidence. At least the jurors in California took their jobs seriously and deliberated for 7 days! The Casey Anthony jurors now know what most people think of their decision, I hope they can sleep at night knowing they've allowed a baby killer to go free. My husband and daughter was part of the Equisearch team looking for Caylee. Casey made fools out of everyone, especially the jurors.

I truly believe the Jury did the best they could, HOWEVER....they must live in a very protected world of innocence that they can't conceive of the evil in this mother. Haven't they heard of the Susan Smith case - the mom who killed her children because she wanted to be with a man she fancied? There is evil in this world and women do horrific things just because they are narcissistic, sociopathic and plain old selfish. That describes Casey. You don't need proof of HOW or WHY a child was murdered. She was murdered! It is obvious a child thrown into a swamp with 3 pieces of duct tape over her face (nose and mouth) was murdered. Why? No one has to know WHY. That is not a requirement in order to find a person guilty. And why is the HOW important? Regardless of what stripped the breath from this child makes no difference. She didn't stop breathing on her own. And no one drove around in that car with the decomposing body other than Casey. Did the Jury throw COMMON SENSE out of the equation in their deliberations? It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to recognize the truth here.

I am left frustrated because someone killed this child and the mother does not want, nor care, to explain what she knows. Aside from the lies, the prosecution could not prove Casey murdered her daughter, nor could they prove she had ever abandoned or mistreated her. Not ever. They could not prove who put Calee in the bag, nor who put the tape on her. No DNA, except for the tech who was testing it. Casey does not seem to care to explain herself and she does not have to - I wish she would. The job of the prosecutor is to make the best case POSSIBLE. Finding a body too late to get cause of death did not help - also the fact that Casey did not crack under pressure didn't help them either. Now we are left filling in the blanks with each of our own prejudices/belief - Everyone who condemns her believe's they KNOW. We don't. Only the murder knows...it may very well have been Casey. However, she had her day in court and has been found "not guilty". Time to move on...let go...let God handle this one.

So the jury is upset about thinking you are incompetent? Here is what I have to say to you the jury: incompetent, incompetent, incompetent, uneducated, low IQ, how do you even go to the bathroom by yourself, moronic, stupid, idiots, INCOMPETENT! There I said it. I hope that upsets you more, since you are more upset about what people think of you than a precious little baby that died a horrible death and was thrown in a swamp like a pile of garbage and left to rot for six months.

The only voice we have as a public at this point is our money and our attention. We must make sure that anyone offering Casey Anthoney, her family, the jurors or her attorneys any money or gifts for talking to them should know our dissatisfaction. Because they are doing just what the celebrating attorneys did as he flipped the F---you finger to the public. DO NOT BUY ANY PRODUCT THAT SPONSORS ANY SHOW BOOK, MAGAZINE AND YES EVEN AMUSEMENT PARK THAT WOULD OFFER GIFTS OR MONEY TO THESE PEOPLE. It is our only voice. I don't want anyone to get physically hurt but I do not want them to profit in anyway from this.

The jury based the verdic on a THEORY THAT HAS NO EVIDENCE , IS NOT THE LAW .OHH WHAT CAYLEE JUMPED OFF THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING . KC LEFT CAYLEE IN THE BATH TUB , WHERE IS THAT KIND OF EVIDENCE , IS THAT A REASONABLE CONCLUSION , THERE ARE SO MANY UNREASONABLE THEORYS . Thats why we have law and rules so a jury dont go out side it . BUT THEY DID AND SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE .

Joseph-I am actually an attorney--what do you do in the legal field, might I ask? I bet you are a runner.
I am stunned by those of you here who claim that there was no evidence. Clearly Americans think evidence=sexy CSI laser-type forensics. The sheer idiocy of the verdict and its subsequent defense by the low-sloping forehead types here is disturbing. It is useless to argue with people who are hardly literate. For the literate here, enjoy this great explanation of how 12 morons came to such a verdict: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/08/casey-anthony-trail-the-sequestered-jury-fell-prey-to-idiotic-groupthink.html

A good friend suggested that the average IQ of the jury probably played a role; we bet the average IQ of the jury was around 90. Even the talking heads on CNN speculated that this jury was not "highly or formally educated." I cannot wait to find out. I bet the majority did not attend college, or perhaps even finish high school

@Delia I totally agree and the ones that are talking are rambling with stupid reasoning. They really need to be quiet to keep from showing more of their ignorance!

If they didn't want to be viewed as incompetent, MAYBE they should have taken notes and attempted to really understand the complicated information given to them!! 6 weeks and they didn't even take their notebooks into deliberation!! They are beyond incompetent!! There was a TON of evidence and they had not one question?!?!?! Come on. They wanted to go home. Bottom line--- they were not only incompetent, they were also lazy and selfish!! I have a trial coming up for the man that murdered my husband and I am terrified this man will walk now that I know how lazy, selfish and incompetent a jury can be!!

I don't think they're incompetent. I think they're actually morons disguised as humans. They could not have deliberated that case in that short of time. They didn't thoroughly go over the evidence, nor did they question lies that were told on the stand. For example that "Spitz" the defense expert who says that a good autopsy (and every one he's ever performed) includes cutting open the skull and testing everything, but he doesn't have a lab or the capability to test everything. However he's done 60,000 thorough autopsies in his career. Anybody else figure that one out? 1 autopsy per day, 365 days per year no days off (not even holidays) equals 164.38 years that he has been performing autopsies. Even 2 a day comes to 82.19 years. I knew the guy was old, but this lie is ludicrous and the jury should've questioned it, if they were looking at their task seriously and not just a way to get their 15 minutes of fame an fortune. I think some of them will now go into hiding, not because they are afraid people will call them incompetent, but because they are ashamed of what they did.

to any of the jurors who do an interview, or write a book-

I will watch your interviews, everyone of them and any books written, I will buy several copies!! Please, the entire world is not against you. There are some critical thinkers out here that want to hear or read, and respect the difficult job put before you and the sacrifice and efforts that went into your job you did!!

all this bothers me,I have been a juror and convicted and also foud some not guilty.We looked over and 2 cases didnot need to review a case so good,but we cannot harm the jurors as when the police show up for you and you say innocent,will the jury fear for their lives and say guilty.I once had a patient of mine confess to killing his wife,my other patient.Believe me both families showing up at hospital and home to threaten me.I was lucky he pleaded to 2nd degree murder or I may have been dead.

Alternate juror #4 is full of it. All he paid attendtion to is a party girl sitting across from him. I am sure all he did was look at her boobs the whole time like most of the guys did.

Per Russell Huekler, he'd be wise to take heed of the adage, "better to be thought a fool than open one's mouth and remove all doubt.". This man seems past ignorant and is just yammering to get his quarter second of fame. He's not doing himself any favors IMO.

CA was judged by her peers, selfish, lazy, incompetent, possibly quite illiterate morons! To have ignored the fundamental facts of the case and not even have her punished for child NEGLECT which led to the child's DEATH, is staggering. Whoever they are they are a disgrace to humanity since they have allowed the wicked death and cover up of an innocent child to go unpunished. Yes Jurors you ALL have blood on your hands.

Did the jury do the best they could? Did they really have Reasonable Doubt? No. When you only spend 45-50 minutes deliberati­ng each charge in a Capital Murder case, when you have a juror telling everyone they have to be on a cruise in 2 days, and when you fail to look at evidence items or hear testimonial read backs, can you really say "We did our best"? The Scott Peterson trial is campared because they are almost identical. However, that jury took 56 hours to reach a verdict, spending an average of 7 hours on each charge. They also looked at all the evidence and had testimonial read backs, none of which the Anthony jury did. Can we as the public declare that there is Reasonable Doubt this jury did the best they could?

Did the jury do the best they could? Did they really have Reasonable Doubt? No. When you ONLY spend 45-50 minutes deliberati­ng each charge in a Capital Murder case, when you have a juror telling everyone they have to be on a cruise in 2 days, and when you fail to look at evidence items or hear testimonial read backs, can you really say "We did our best"? The Scott Peterson trial is campared because they are almost identical. However, that jury took 56 hours to reach a verdict, spending an average of 7 hours on each charge. They also looked at all the evidence and had testimonial read backs, none of which the Anthony jury did. They whizzed through each count in only 45-50 minutes and made sure that juror got on her cruise just in time. Can we as the public declare that there is Reasonable Doubt this jury did the best they could?

Probably my last on the subject of these jurors. It defies logic and reason they finished as fast as they did. Also, if Caylee had been found absent duct tape, which she was not, you'd still have to get past searching for chloroform months prior and then finding chloroform in the trunk at levels so HIGH still more than a month after Caylee was last seen. Caylee did not suffocate herself with the tape on her nose and mouth, she did not apply chloroform to herself so she would not fight the application of tape, and she did not lie for 31 days till forced to speak with 911 dispatch. IMO it can only be concluded Casey did those things. Those jurors IMO are the worst our society has to offer to consider such important issues as the murder of a tiny little girl.

HEY DEAN, RUSSELL and Juror #3 JENNIFER,
WE don’t think your incompetent We have evidence that you ALL ARE!
We are just smart enough to see it. We were not out here counting our $$$$ on book deals and interviews we were PAYING ATTENTION

if you disagree with the jury,
go to www.change.org
and sign the petition "The U.S Supreme Court: Try Casey Anthony in Federal Court"
Don't forget Caylees's law"

12 PEOPLE ARE RIGHT AND THE WHOLE WORLD IS WRONG ,
REALLY , Thats what it comes down to . The jury failed to read the LAW and ask Questions . They based their decsions on a theory of their own ,and thats not the LAW to deliberate for a verdict .

The jury made the only 'right' decision possible. They could not bring a murder or manslaughter or child abuse conviction when there was no proof. Not reporting a drowning to the police is not not evidence of murder. Disposing of a body in an inappropriate - even criminal - manner is not evidence that a crime was committed aside from the disposal of the remains. Fortunately, 12 jurors were not nearly as ignornant about the law and our constitution as the majority of our country appears.

Hundreds of photos? So you lie as well as many associated with the case. good mother? From people who knew Casey less than a month before Caylee is dead? Casey met tony L. end of May 2008, his roommates who said gosh good mother only saw Caylee twice with Casey, Caylee was dead June 16, so these character witnesses saw her "character" less than a full month. BTW: Good mothers don't kill their kid or lie about their kid being alive when she is dead. Monsters do that and Monsters like you make excuses for it, because your kind is just like her..

While i'm on the subject...good mothers do not steal from the checking account of people in their 80's as she did. They don't steal money from the piggy bank of a 2 year old as she did. They don't steal 700 dollars from their friend's checking account, forging name and ID to pull it off. They don't sell images of their dead kid for 200,000 dollars to ABC while claiming she is alive and use those ill gotten sums to defend from charges she killed the kid.

Misty has to be the only friend Casey has left or a relative of one of the jurors !!!

This must be the first murder trial that these Casey supporters have experienced. MURDER doesn't come with witnesses and videos. Just because the defense kept drawing pictures (what do you want me to do---draw you a picture?) doesn't make it evidence. Also, has the defense come out in the media thanking the jurors for FREEING AN INNOCENT PERSON? NO, they can't believe their LUCK... picking a jury lacking "COMMON SENSE". They are not saying a word about it cause they can't believe it themselves.

Just wondering... do these 12 jurors work as characters at Disney World. They sure are living in a fantasy.

Why did Casey abandon her car that smelled of death? If she ran out of gas, why didn't she just walk to gas station (which was in walking distance) and continue to use the car? Also, if George was involved... why the hell was he so pissed off that he had to pay ... what $500.00 to get the car out of the tow yard? COME ON...

Speaking of thanks or no thanks. Roy Kronk according to reports, was never thanked by any member of that family for finding little Caylee. In fact, though alerted to the find of a small child just up from their house, the Anthonys, Baez and that investigator Dominic Casey dined at the Ritz, Cindy had crab puffs, steak was ordered for Baez, most of that was brought to jurors attention when george was on the stand and was asked by Ashton.

Nice try with more BS Misty...Casey herself texted the car stunk twice, with last time she did right prior to her abandoning it...and the reason the defense did not call the tow driver is he said day he picked the car up he had a horrible sinus cold...it is in his depo...as for friends riding in it, it takes days for the stink, esp. when wrapped inside several plastic garbage bags and that inside a laundry bag...they rode on 17th of June per prior depo..1 day is not going to let that smell be so noticeable...

what about the 24th? that would have been 8 days past..and the tow driver didn't say he had a horrible sinus infection, his depo clearly states he didn't smell anything, but he was on the backside of a cold..keep the facts straight..and then July 15th, a month past and the smell is worse with no body? I am the one thinking logically here..

Gosh misty using your logic George did smell decomp on the 24th..after al you call him a liar...can't have it both ways...and it was you who tried to spin the actual tow driver, only AFTER I mentioned cold as reason defense did not call him did you even mention it, instead to tried to use him to make things look shady...then there is the issue of cadaver dog hitting on trunk, plus umpteen human witnesses who smelled it, and several forensic tests, like decomp banded hair in trunk and chem signature of decomp in trunk....

no RS-

re read the George Anthony depo's he CLEARLY states, there was NO smell of human decomp on that day,the June 24th,2008 day, nor anything that appeared strange regarding the interior or items in the trunk. I have read every single depo, you have your so called facts wrong.

the human decomp smell time line the state put forth just does not add up when you stop and think about it...sorry..cant make a murder out of an accidental drowning no matter how hard one tries to manufacture one.JMHO

LIAR....he didn't get close enough is the testimony..and if you read everything as you claim then you would shut up about it, because your golden girl herself texted several days apart her car STUNK and did so right prior to abandoning it. One thing is clear, those that defend her in posts will lie just as fast as she did....you are no exception, lie like a rug...

Juror # 3 didnt seem to read the instructions. She said they could have found her guilty were it not for the death penalty.

But they had lesser counts beyond murder in the 1st degree, ie, death penalty. But you have to read past the first few lines of the jury instructions to get to that.

Guess she couldnt be bothered.

There was no evidence of a drowning put forth, just some pics an alive Caylee able to climb some stairs...gosh why didn't they say see she can walk, why she walked out on the street in front of a car, or outside and got bit by a snake...or stolen by dingos since she had abilities..also if she had opened the glass door folks inside would then hear outside noises they had not been able to hear...unless considerate Caylee closed the door behind herself...none of what defense coughed up adds up...nothing they offered did....

If there was an "accident" that caused Caylee's death, then why would the whole family cover it up? The parents spent the months prior to Caylee's disappearance warning Casey's rooommates and friends not to trust her, that she lies, steals, cheats, and is very good at it. To watch out because she is a bad person, already arrested for check fraud and theft. This does not sound like parents who would cover up an accident for Casey. Also, we all saw the parents jail visits where they are begging Casey to tell them were Caylee was... and Casey showing her sociopath behavior. Since the nanny was a total lie, and since it was covered in court that Casey got the drowning scenario from another inmate while in custody, that leaves one suspect and only one suspect.... Casey Anthony. So Casey... Nanny made up... Drowning made up. So how do you explain Caylee's disappearance when you were the very last person with her? This jury is on the defensive, making excuses. They say they followed the law... no they did not. All evidence, every piece, points to Casey, and Casey alone. Plus, how can you, as a jury, justify your verdict when you spent only a mere 45-50 minutes on each count in a capital murder case? You whizzed through each count in less time it takes a person to order their lunch, eat it, then return to work. Never asked to examine evidence, and you did not request any read backs of testimony? Only 9 measly hour on all those counts. 45-50 minutes spent per count... Pathetic!

She is guilty of murder. I believe she sedated and drowned Caylee in the bath tub. The duck tape was put over the childs nose and mouth because Casey not being able to make sure she was dead did not want the water to be able to be expelled from Caylee's nose and lungs. She deserved the death penalty. The jury concentrated on everything than what they should have, example, punishment, the judge handles the punishment not the jury, jury could not figure out how, when and where, they did not need to in order to arrive at a verdict. These things are for sure
1. Casey was last person with Caylee, no doubt in my mind
2. Caylee is dead, no doubt in my mind
3. Death was premeditated, no doubt in my mind
Jury is stupid, and biased
I also believe jury talked about the case with one another outside of the deliberation room, why else did they ask to see some evidence in the middle of the trial, at least 2-3 jurors are quilty of this

The jurors complained about not having enough evidence, but it was their job to connect the dots and fill in the blanks the same way police detectives do when investigating a crime. Unless a crime has many witnesses or was caught on video, there will always be some level of doubt. The jury should have given more thought to the huge mountain of circumstantial evidence against Casey Anthony.---Ty Treadwell, author of Last Suppers: Famous Final Meals from Death Row

http://lastsuppersbook.blogspot.com/

Personally, I think the world had done marked Casey before the trail even started. To me, everybody has over looked the fact that Casey is/was a 22 yr old CHILD herself. She isn't/wasn't too smart on decisions and she lived in a fantasy world. Sadly to state, but I feel Caylee was nothing but a toy to Casey. A toy where she put away when she gets bored of it and her parents allowed this to happen. Everybody is questioning the month of not saying a word about Caylee's missing days. Well, what about the grandparents - you can not tell me that they went a month without seeing their grandchild and not asked questions. I'm a mother of three and a grandmother of three. I talk to my daughter - the mother of my grandkids- on a day to day bases and I see my grandkids at lease 3 times a week. I could NEVER go a month without seeing them. I don't see a grandparent doing so, unless they live in another state. I feel the crime is family relative, but I think Casey is naive about it. I would put my finger on an 'ex-law inforcer'. I don't think the jurors did a bad job at their decision. But I do think the police detectives did a incomplete job of gathering facts. They were focused on one think, Casey's immature state of age. They should have looked deeper and not just on her.

This jury was incapable. A prosecutor sums it up perfectly:
"This jury found it reasonable to believe that a grandfather would see his granddaughter drown in an innocent manner, w/ no criminal liability, take that innocent accident, cover it up to frame his own daughter for 1st-degree murder & watch her have to battle a potential death penalty. They found it reasonable, so, under our system, she’s not guilty.”
This jury wanted to know if a crime had been committed. NO idiots, it is reasonable to think that there's been no crime when mother of the dead child has performed computer searches for "neck breaking" and "chloroform" (rather than say "drowning" or "resuscitation"), when 30 days pass before child is reported missing, when mother is out parting while child is missing, when mother abandons her car that stinks to kingdom come of a corpse and has levels of chloroform that are described as "shocking" by a guy who works with dead bodies every day)? No, no crime here. Jurors should have to pass a logic test or demonstrate that they are competent, capable of processing complex information & of applying deductive reasoning and critical thinking. This is hard and it's supposed to be - it takes focus & ability to link complex info & draw reasonable (not absolute) conclusions. This jury was looking for absolutes b/c having to think and put things together logically was too hard for them. They were incapable. No, jurors, you're not incompetent, you're lazy & incapable!

As a Juror I would have done the same as they did! There was NO evidence that she did it or even how she died! George looked more guilty to me!
1)He went to get the car at the impound and brought a gas can that had the same duck tape that was used on the child.
2) He knew the car was out of gas and that it sat in the parking lot for three days. How did he know that? The impound guy said he did not tell him how long the car had sat in the parking lot.
3)Then George who is an ex cop calls the police to report a missing gas can(the same one he took to get the car). Being an ex cop do you really believe he would call in a stolen gas can? Knowing that they would do nothing about something like that? I do not think so.
4)Then they showed at the fundraiser that he was the only person from the family and had the same duck tape on the table.
5)Then the Mistress of Georges testified that he told her "it was an accident that got out of control!"
6)Then you have an ex cop you MIGHT have sexually abused her, a mother that the State made clear was on Physiological medication!
I think George was baby sitting and the mother was either there or gone and the baby got into the pool and drowned and then George tried to covered it up. He then buried the baby in plastic and duck tape like he did with the same method as he did with his yard full of dead pets. If the state had used these things against George then they would have had a guilty verdict and the jury would have had more evidence!

If everyone who came from a dysfunctional family didn't have emotion when their kids died, there would never be any funerals and our swamps would be full of people. Her family being dysfunctional in NO WAY explains her actions after the child's death. Accident or Murder!! She was glad that little girl was gone- Had it been an accident, there is HUGE reasonable doubt that she would have been happy. Having it be her own plan to kill the child is the ONLY thing that explains her carefree happy attitude after the child's death. These jurors were lazy and thoughtless.

NEWSFLASH
Casey's aquital was due to an unforseen "Perfect Storm".
1. Many Jurors had to be "persuaded" to say they would "consider" the death penalty One said would vote to repeal it!
2. Jose Baez was allowed to "taint" the jury by making outrageous claims on behalf of CASEY the SOCIOPATH about sexual abuse and an accidental drowning knowing he couldn't show evidence of it or prove it. Her perfect lie/ploy concocted 6 weeks prior to trial to gain sympathy and cause doubt and hesitation amongst the jurors
3. George, Cindy, and Lee all lied about some things on the stand for Casey because they knew she killed Caylee but did they did not want her put to death What they really want to know is wether it was an accident or intentional. NO DOUBT it was one of the two
4. The jurors did not get to hear alot of other evidence that would have opened their eyes to "Casey's DIABOLICAL Mind". If they had been made aware of all of Casey's character flaws/personality disorders (SOCIOPATH) they would have had NO DOUBT!
5. It seems NONE of jurors aware of EXCLUDED evidence prior to being selected. Ex: Casey wanted to give baby up for adoption but Cindy would not allow it, Casey and friends would bury deceased pets with heart sticker when young at same spot, Casey was a chronic and manipulative thief, Cindy knew Casey was a Sociopath prior to Caylee's death. The list goes on. Looked at all documents, interviews, statements
6. Google Tracy McLaughlin and listen about Casey.

Foreman says many believe she killed the kid...had he and others paid better attention, state did say how she died, suffocated with duct tape, ME also ruled homicide. Anyway here are quotes from Fox Atlanta.
"When I had to sign off on the verdicts, the sheet that was given to me, there was a feeling of disgust that came across me, knowing that my signature and hers were going to be there, on the same sheet," said the jury forman.
The jury foreman in the Casey Anthony trial -- who asked not to be identified -- says many of the jurors believe Casey Anthony killed her daughter Caylee.

But because the prosecution never showed how it happened, they were -- by the letter of the law -- forced to rule for acquittal on all murder charges.

wow rs- why didn't you include the article in its entirety?
for those of you who would like to see the ENTIRE article, here it is:
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/dpp/news/national/Jury-Foreman-Talks-About-Casey-Anthony-Trial-20110711-am-sd

a little more of what rs chose to leave out-
The jury foreman also tells Van Susteren Casey wasn't the only Anthony family member that raised an eyebrow of suspicion during the trial.

"Did anyone think George was believable, out of the 12 of you, George was believable or credible or were others likewise suspicious of him," asked Greta Van Susteren.

"There was a suspicion, there was a suspicion of him that was a part of our conversation that we had of what I'd call the round robin of topics we had when we were doing deliberation," said the jury foreman.

They didn't say they believed George killed the kid......from the quotes that are there, those jurors did not follow the law at all. State was NEVER required to prove what was used to kill Caylee, but in spite of that they did offer a paint by number description. This jury could have had a knife found in and among the remains or a gun and still did what they did ignoring the law. Knife or gun among remains is no different than 3 layers of duct tape part of which had melded to jaw....this jury would still have skipped town as fast as they could and excuse makers like you would still be on blogs offering your BS.

Anthony was properly charged by a Grand jury consisting of people called to jury duty. Here is foreman's quote again indicating they believe she killed the kid...so you may wish to address jurors as "hate mongers" ...LOL..
"When I had to sign off on the verdicts, the sheet that was given to me, there was a feeling of disgust that came across me, knowing that my signature and hers were going to be there, on the same sheet," said the jury forman.
The jury foreman in the Casey Anthony trial -- who asked not to be identified -- says many of the jurors believe Casey Anthony killed her daughter Caylee.

But because the prosecution never showed how it happened, they were -- by the letter of the law -- forced to rule for acquittal on all murder charges.

It's amazing how people are talking about the constitution, etc. BUT SHOW NO RESPECT OR REGARD that LAW ENFORCEMENT, FBI, and the STATE OF FLORIDA (all parts of Government) charged the proper person for this crime...CASEY ANTHONY and NO ONE ELSE. Use your heads... if they thought for one minute (and IF there was evidence) George or any other person would ALSO have also been on trial. IT WAS CASEY ANTHONY ON TRIAL FOR THE MURDER OF HER 2 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER. It the jury wasn't sleeping or thinking about their own fame and fortune then JUSTICE would have been served. This jury most certainly was incompetent..... to say the least.

Jennifer already admitted that the jurors barely looked at the forensic evidence.It's obvious with a short deliberation in a case with complicated forensic evidence; They didn't understand and were overwhelmed by it. You have to go through a very tedious process, especially with a CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE CASE; where, you have to put the numerous pieces of evidence, including documents and declarations together.They were either unable as a whole, or very lazy with a major lack of notetaking, which is CRUCIAL!

MARIO, THE JURY FOCUSED ON: The Punishment; the second phase of the trail what happened to the first part? They has to be classes on the special Instructions;; This proved the jury was lost on the first PAGE.. Without a reason of doubt--HELLO Jennifer ford where the hell did you do with common sense..Justice for Caylee, The new law has 100.000. people sign the Petition. Felony 1 if you do not report your child missing in the first 24 hours... Futher more she was her CARETAKER,CHILD NEGLECT TO ALLOW YOUR CHILD TO DIE BY HANDS OF YOU, Your car smelled of her Decomposed body...yOU BORROWED THE SHOVEL FROM THE NIEGHBOR.. yOU ADMITTED SHE WAS DIED BY YOU ATTORNEYS STATEMENT....@ JOE no way are you a attorney,,you SIT ON YOUR BRAINS,,,,WHAT BRAINS,,???

@MARIO THIS IS YOUR WIFE maria,,,

go Caylee's law this is an answer to all ,hope every one believe will sign in to make caylee's law so we can prevent another case like this .
this trial was an embarrassment to me as a mother living a child behind ..where is the bond that connect us to our children??? go casey as professional they gave you your diploma .congratulation ,,.

If Cindy Anthony is not charged with perjury and held above the law. That will be another injustice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO ONE is above the law under any circumstances

If a woman were found with duct tape on her skull, double bagged in a swamp and the husband had been saying for 31 days she was with her gal pal named Zany and did not report her missing till forced, and 6 months later they find the lady's skeletal remains up the street from him, this jury would acquit the husband. It would not matter to them the husband lied for 31 days, that he searched for chloroform or that levels were found in his trunk or duct tape accessible to him, his cell phone records put him with the lady last day he said he saw her. The aforementioned, IMO reveals as analogy, just how incompetent this jury was IMO. IMO off the scale incompetent.

If you put yourself in Caylee Marie Anthony's shoes just for 5 minutes do you think she would say the jurors are Incompetent?? I think the jurors are village idiots. When they were being jurors, the village was relieved they were gone. Look who is holding out for more the $50,000.00 for an interview. Look who quit her job to go into hiding...WOW! Look at the juror who has a rap sheet for one of the reason casey was in jail, CHECK FRAUD! The jurors are mad or upset because we think they are Incompetent?? Why is a baby killer being set free? Why did 2 of the jurors want to make it a guilty plea but they were swayed to not guilty? Yes, this makes them Incompetent. I do hope that when Casey is let go on Sunday that all of you watch your kids because if they get in the way of Casey, there is no telling what she will do.
I hope when you go to bed at night, you are able to say that you are proud to be an american and what america stands for. I also hope for all the jerks out there that you would feel safe letting Casey babysit your kids. Until the 17 jurors can prove all but 600 americans wrong, maybe they are Incompetent... so if the soes fit wear it. Oh and if they did not want to be Incompetent, why did they do what they did???

What I don't understand is HOW these jurors are now coming out, one by one, saying that they are SICK that they had to find her not guilty. That they NEVER said she was innocent!!!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME??? THAT is what a jury is FOR!!! obviously, they did NOT understand reasonable doubt. If Casey did not do it, who did then??? And if it WAS an accident, is it OKAY to toss her into a swamp??? This is a total miscarriage of justice and something MUST be done!!! IF I WERE ON THAT JURY, there is NO WAY that I would have voted NOT GUILTY, no matter HOW LONG i had to sit there. There is NO WAY an INNOCENT mother would go and party after her baby died...i don't care what ANYONE says!!! She acted like a care free teenager after Caylee died, accidentally or not. That just shows that she didn't CARE about poor lil Caylee. SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!!!! EVERYONE knows that this monster is guilty!!! whats it going to take?? Her having ANOTHER child then find that child dead somewhere??? it makes me SICK!!!

I just read the comments for the jury foreman, in hiding of course, he is incompetent, paid no attention to trial content, except what he imagined he heard or did not hear. George said in front of him the car stunk, the tow manager said in front of him the car stunk, Cindy in 911 call said the car stunk, Lee said the car stunk. For him to say nobody except George mentioned it is a LIE, he is a LIAR, and a useless piece of dung to have sat on that jury. Then he has his second excuse ready of even if it did...blah, blah. Well did he not pay attention to defense fighting tooth and nail to deny there had been a body in the trunk, to make it seem like garbage, and who does the defense represent? Spin all you want jurors who keep talking and making themselves look worse, we listened to trial testimony, and we know a BS excuse that includes lies about trial content when we hear one.

For the village idiots that are trying to defend Casey by saying some smelled decomp in the trunk, some didn't smell decomp in the trunk, some had sinus infections, etc, etc... I have two words for you !! CADAVER DOGS.... These dogs have no allegiance to anyone, they are not part of a cover up, and they didn't help get rid of the body. They came and did their job. And two dogs on two separate ocassions with different handlers both hit on Casey's trunk of her car, so spare me your BS stories.

I was upset Casey got away almost scott-free. Proving she was a liar and getting 4 years sure was not enough. She has to face the consequence for her actions or in-actions.
It's sickening to read what Jerk Joseph wrote. So glad that many of you are hurling words at that idiot.

The jurors did NOT follow the law! They bought the Casey Kool-Aid and just wanted to go home! Where was ANY proof of an accident? Where was ANY proof that Casey was a "victim" of abuse??
Where was ANY evidence that ANYone in her family covered up ANYthing?? WHY MAKE AN ACCIDENT LOOK LIKE A MURDER?????

Incompetent is right. Like he said, he "thought" her family life played a role even though there was no evidence whatsoever for Caycee being abused. This juror fell hook, line, and sinker for Baez fantasy about the baby drowning. It takes intelligence and competence to look at the whole body of evidence and to reach the right verdict, something this jury was unable to do. Probably because of the juror's attitude towards emotions and the feeling and intuitive functions of consciousness. This is the problem in the USA right now; narcissism is epidemic, and people's hearts are hardened and closed. The heart is the seat of the soul and of intuition. Contrary to popular belief, the heart is also the seat of intelligence and morality. Without their hearts engaged, it was impossible for this jury to reach the right verdict. No...I am not abdicating blindly going by feelings and gut instinct...of course cognitive thinking is also important. The jury in the Scott Peterson case sent him to death with not even half as much evidence as was presented in the Anthony case. This jury deserves the judgement it has received.

was proven Scott Peterson had classic motive...Casey had no motive. The child didn't interfere with her life...she was partying before the child died, and partied after..no changes..no motive. She loved her child witnessed by friends, family, pictures, and videos

Yeah, she loved her child so much that she went to blockbuster the same night she went missing and rented two movies. One was about a child being kidnapped and the other was about getting away with a murder. And she loved her so much she entered a hot body contest two nights later.

I have read many of the comments posted and can understand that people have different perspectives of the case. The bottom line is that the jury made their verdict and it should be respected. There is the ultimate judge that CA will have to face someday. God is only one that truly knows what happened on that tragic day that Caylee lost her life. If CA is guilty she will face eternity in hell which is far worst than life in prison. I can not even believe that a loving mother would behave as CA did knowing her child was missing. CA is not a normal person though. It is obvious she has mental issues so it should be expected that she would have inappropriate reactions. Nobody should take their anger and frustrations out on the judge, jury, CA's lawyer, or even the prosecutors for not presenting a more solid case. I believe they all did their jobs to the best of their abilities. All we can do now is leave it in God's hands. Beautiful little Caylee is with the Lord, and her murderer will suffer in hell one day.

Misty, once again you post lies. Dogs did not clear area on suburban in august, they were not sent in, the area they were was far further down the road at the school.. And as to sniff one day and not the next, we all watched the trial content, we know CSI cleared surface material in the back yard, that is explanation given by the experts in direct testimony. And state is not required to prove motive at all that was explained to jurors by the judge. And even if they were there was plenty of motive, she claimed she is a spiteful B word as reason won't take cindy to Caylee, and she did want to party at night. If it takes lies to defend your position and you have posted umpteen dozen of them I'd give up your position if i were you.

rs-
not posting lies, just not posting distorted and twisted truth as you are. If the dogs hit on the back yard and didn't the next day, your saying because they soil was disturbed? then your disturbed...these dogs were released to sniff the yard, they have these alleged bionic sniffers, I am sure they could have smelled through the same soil a few feet away. The remains area was cleared, per the hoopla surrounding Roy kronk..and not down the street at the school(twist) and also were cleared by the Pensacola dogs brought in per Jordan on the witness stand, you know the witness that had been "threatened" by OCPD? get your facts straight

My facts are straight, backyard material was removed per direct testimony..and not repeating what I posted above about suburban whether it relates to OCSO dogs or Jordan's pal...nowhere near the actual site..it is in testimony...you have a habit of posting obvious lies and the problem you have, as do jurors is we all heard what they heard..

Well said John Boy !!!

Susan Smith strapped her 2 little boys in the back seat and watched them drown --then she admitted she wanted a single life? SOund familiar and she was told she was a GOOD mother (videos,etc). Karen Murphy, Bristow, VA strapped her 2 yr old into mini van and lef them 8hrs and he died (2nd time she left him), she was told she was a good mother. 42 women last year killed their children. We have a narcissistic, sociopath generation of mothers WHO are HOLLOW--they feel nothing for the CHILD and we had 12 jurors who felt nothing for CAYLEE--they focused on Casey not the victim. They are hollow and as guilty for no Justice as the mother. She was mad at her mother and I'll show YOU! She left her in the back seat, parties and duck taped her, gave her chloroform, and she died. The shovel, the lies, the search, she killed her..you don't even have to have a body to prove guilt. DR. G said it was homicide. Juror #11 convinced the others & he made up his mind..I would have stuck to my gut..she did it and these sickos let a child killer go back into society just like they did for OJ when he beheaded his ex and stabbed a 23 year old boy 60 times...they did not care...no matter HOW much evidence...

Michele, worse for the excuse making jurors IMO is the fact the grief lady said right in front of them she appeared at the Susan Smith trial. Johnboy......since the state was not required to offer or prove a motive and he and the rest were instructed on that, the fact he mentions that, to me, makes him incompetent.

911 Operator “what is you emergency ”
my name is “Casey Anthony” me and my jury buddies are hanging out and a mob has gathered outside, we are afraid they will hurt us!
911 Operator “call back in 31 DAYS”

Why should they let the TRUTH bother them now?

http://www.wftv.com/video/28498264/index.html

In case some of you missed the press conference held by the State of Florida Sheriff,etc. Please click this link: This is part 1. hhttp://www.wftv.com/video/28524185/index.htm. GEORGE ANTHONY WAS NEVER A SUSPECT!!!!!!!

Sue, thanks for posting that. I have to tell you that I never, ever thought George, or anyone other than Casey Anthony, was the guilty party.

Hi Everyone!
I just wanted to let you all know that I have never seen so many comments on one single story on Palm Harbor Patch. I can really tell that people are truly passionate about this topic!

CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence is as compelling as fact and is allowed in trial and you can convict on it. That's why you heard it. It wasn't for entertainment. If you have no common sence then you should never have served on the jury. Life is not just about book learning... life is about THINKING. Yes you were expected to put the dots together. We can't change anything but as you look back and think about it. Have you ever put a puzzle together and find several pieces are missing yet you can still know what the picture is? Did you fail to look at the whole puzzle before saying "I can't make out what this is". YOU HELD NO ONE ACCOUNTABLE NOT EVEN THAT CHILD WAS IN MOTHERS CARE. YOU DID NOT HAVE TO KNOW THE CAUSE OF DEATH and THERE WAS ONLY ONE CHARGE THAT CARRIED THE DEATH PENALTY. WAS THE MOTHER NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT CHILD IN ANY WAY. FORGET THE DEATH, THE LIES, FAMILY LIFE. RESPONSIBLITY. I WOULD NEVER WANT ANY OF YOU TO BABYSIT FOR ME. That is why CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence is allowed in a trial. I wish no harm to you other than for every day you wake, someone stops you and ask "WHY?". WHY?

DEAR JURORS: Lets see. A child is left in the care of her MOTHER. Child dies. MOTHER fails to report child missing MUCH LESS THE DEATH OF THE CHILD. MOTHER lies to everyone to mislead everyone into thinking child is ok. Grandparents find car that was last seen driven by the MOTHER. It stank like death confirmed by grandparents and others. Grandparents report child missing 31 days after last seeing child WITH MOTHER. MOTHER of child still lies as to whereabouts even claiming to have talked to her that day. MOTHER STILL REFUSES TO REPORT CHILD MISSING. MOTHER NEVER DID EVEN TO THIS DAY. Child is found dead and yet MOTHER will not tell anyone as to why or how child died or even WHY SHE NO LONGER HAD CHILD IN HER CARE. IN NO WAY DID YOU HOLD THE MOTHER ACCOUNTABLE. You made the satement that all was "speculation". It's called CIRCUMSTANTIAL. Are you so naive and lack worldly experance that you can not see. There is no man more blind than one who WILL not see. A cause of death was NEVER needed as the COURT WOULD NEVER ALLOWED THE CASE TO GO TO TRIAL.

Hey Jurors,
STOP trying to explain yourselves. THERE IS NO EXPLANATION!!!!!! Try explaining Casey's reasoning for all the lies and you'll come up with if she tells the truth she'll have to admit that she committed murder. OH, now she can't do that, Can she? What happened was-------- A batch of idiots were chosen for this jury---all 12 of you. At least one person should have had enough sense to render a GUILTY verdict on circumstatial evidence. Now live with the fact that you let a murderer go free and I am betting that by now you all see that you made a mistake but you don't have the guts to say it. By the way, the fact that you have no guts is no surprise and that is exactly why Casey Anthony is walking free and no justice was done for little Caylee.
Thanks Idiots---I mean jurors.

If I were to babysit for you while you were on vacation for a month. You get back I do not have your child. I was telling everyone that your child was at the beach with friends. I tell you that I just spoke with your child that day and everything is ok. You the cops and they find I have been lieing to everyone about your child. I wont tell you where your child is nor will I tell you why I do not have your child. SHOULD THE LAW IGNOR THAT I WAS THE LAST SEEN WITH YOUR CHILD.
Later on they find you kid dead dumped in a swamp in garbage bags and duct tape over your childs mouth. They try to get me to explain why the child was dead and/or why the child was not still in my care. I wont tell. SHOULD I BE HELD RESPONSIBLE IN ANY WAY OR SHOULD I BE ALLOWED TO GO ABOUT MY BUSINESS NEVER TELLING ANYONE WHY YOUR CHILD DIED WHILE YOUR CHILD SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN MY CARE? You do not want to say that I killed your kid because you don't know. Right? I was the only person known to have your child and I told all those lies about your kid. LET'S SAY I DID NOT KILL YOUR CHILD. COULD I BE CHARGED WITH CHILD NEGLECT SINCE YOUR CHILD WAS IN MY CARE? COULD I BE CHARGED WITH CHILD ENDANGERMENT FOR LETTING YOUR CHILD WALK AROUND IN THAT SWAMP WITH DUCK TAPE OVER HER MOUTH AND GARBAGE BAGS OVER HER HEAD. WHAT THE FXXX. GO AND WE ALL GO HOME. I won't ever tell you what happened to your kid why she was not with me or how she died.SHOULD NO ONE BE RESPONSIBLE? REMEMBER.....it's just your KID.

There's another angle to this. Jurors had to be found who had little knowledge of the case. That means magazine and newspaper "virgins." Those who do not read are dull. Dull people are not popular. Jose Baez made a huge effort to be welcoming and friendly to these folks, always smiling, saying hello with an effusive grin each morning. They bonded with him early and gratefully. For all their skill at assembling a practically airtight case with EIGHT pieces of evidence any two of which would have convicted St. Peter, the prosecutors were serious, unsmiling bright people -- the type this kind of juror dislikes and fears. 'Nough said?

Baez big book reveal is she's whacked in the head. He has the audacity to criticize Detectives of not realizing on July 16th 2008 tht she was "not playing with a full deck." Well, they had a few hours with her and were tying to fina a 34 month old baby girl, He had more than three years, yet never did he think to go the mental health defense, even although his client could potentially be executed. The same Jose Baez was essentially the one who kept her from talking to the cops and for almost a year he was at least publically still calling this a case of stranger abduction. He obviously knows more than the two shrinks he hired who could not find anything wrong with her and who both claimed she did not fit the profile of someone who had been sexually abused. Baez is a charleton who needs a hook for his book.

Judge Perry called the Jury IDIOTS TODAY!!!